Henan LIMING Heavy Industry Science and Technology Co. LTD which mainly manufacture large and medium-sized crushing and grinding equipments was founded in 1987. It is a modern joint-stock corporation with research, manufacturing and sales together
MOBILE CRUSHERS
Stationary Crushers
Grinding Mills
Accessory Equipment
OUR
Applications
LATEST
NEWS
Limestone powder brings benefit to concrete mixing plant
How to Reduce Crusher Wear Part Costs 30/9/2026
Crusher wear parts are one of the most important operating costs in mining, quarrying, and aggregate production.
Jaw plates, cone crusher liners, mantles, concaves, blow bars, and other wear components are continuously exposed to high impact, compression, and abrasion. In hard-rock applications, poor operating conditions can shorten wear-part life significantly and lead to frequent replacements, production interruptions, and higher maintenance costs.
However, high wear costs are not always unavoidable.
By improving crusher selection, feed conditions, operating parameters, maintenance practices, and wear-part management, operators can often extend wear life and reduce the cost per ton of finished material.
This guide explains practical ways to reduce crusher wear part costs without sacrificing production or product quality.
Before trying to reduce wear-part costs, determine why the parts are wearing.
Different materials create different wear patterns.
Common factors include:
Material hardness
Abrasiveness
Feed size
Material shape
Moisture and clay content
Crushing ratio
Crusher operating speed
Closed-side setting (CSS)
Feed distribution
Chamber selection
Operating hours
For example, granite and basalt can cause significantly more abrasive wear than many softer limestone applications.
Iron ore and other metallic ores can also create demanding operating conditions.
The first step should therefore be to identify the actual wear mechanism rather than simply replacing parts with a different material.
There is no single wear-part material that is ideal for every crushing application.
The correct choice depends on the material and crushing stage.
For example, jaw crusher wear parts may include different grades and profiles of manganese steel, while cone crusher liners are available in different designs for different feed and product conditions.
When selecting wear parts, consider:
Material hardness
Abrasiveness
Feed size
Crusher type
Crushing stage
Expected production
Required product size
Operating conditions
A wear part with a higher purchase price may provide a lower total cost if it lasts significantly longer.
The correct comparison is therefore not:
Price per wear part
but:
Wear-part cost per ton
One of the simplest ways to evaluate wear-part performance is to calculate the cost per ton.
A basic formula is:
Wear Part Cost per Ton = Total Wear Part Cost ÷ Tons Produced
For example, suppose a cone crusher uses a liner set costing $10,000 and produces 50,000 tons before replacement.
The wear cost is:
$10,000 ÷ 50,000 tons = $0.20/ton
If a different liner costs $12,000 but lasts for 75,000 tons:
$12,000 ÷ 75,000 tons = $0.16/ton
Although the second liner costs more to purchase, its cost per ton is lower.
This is why purchasing decisions should be based on total operating economics rather than the lowest initial price.
Uneven feeding is one of the most common causes of inefficient crushing and irregular wear.
A crusher should ideally receive a consistent feed across the crushing chamber.
Poor feeding can result in:
Localized liner wear
Reduced crushing efficiency
Increased vibration
Lower throughput
Unstable product size
Higher energy consumption
For cone crushers, maintaining a proper choke-fed condition can help distribute crushing forces more evenly and improve liner utilization.
For jaw crushers, a stable feed rate and suitable feed distribution can help prevent excessive wear on specific sections of the jaw plates.
Sending material larger than the crusher's recommended feed size can dramatically increase mechanical stress.
Oversized rocks can cause:
Higher impact loads
Uneven wear
Crusher blockages
Reduced capacity
Increased power consumption
Damage to components
The blasting, loading, and primary crushing processes should therefore be coordinated.
If the feed contains too much oversized material, improving upstream rock fragmentation may sometimes reduce downstream wear costs.
In other words, wear management does not start at the crusher. It starts at the mine face or quarry face.
The closed-side setting (CSS) has a direct influence on crusher performance and wear.
If the setting is too small, the crusher may experience:
Higher crushing forces
Increased power consumption
Higher wear rates
Greater risk of operating outside the recommended conditions
If the setting is too large, the crusher may produce insufficient reduction and increase the load on downstream equipment.
The correct CSS should balance:
Capacity + Product Size + Energy Consumption + Wear Life
Operators should avoid changing the setting simply to increase production without considering the effect on wear.
Cone crusher chamber selection has a major impact on wear-part performance.
The chamber should match:
Feed size
Feed gradation
Required product size
Material characteristics
Crusher operating conditions
A chamber that is poorly matched to the application may produce an unfavorable crushing profile and accelerate liner wear.
For example, a chamber designed for finer crushing may not be the best choice for a large feed application.
Proper chamber selection can improve both product quality and wear-part utilization.
Feed gradation is another important factor.
A crusher does not process only one particle size in real-world operation. The feed normally contains a range of particle sizes.
If the feed contains too much fine material, the crushing chamber may behave differently from the intended design.
If the feed contains too much coarse material, crushing forces can increase.
A properly designed screening and scalping system can help control the feed entering the crusher.
This may reduce unnecessary crushing and improve wear distribution.
Moisture and clay can create problems in crushing and screening circuits.
Sticky material may:
Block the feed opening
Reduce effective chamber volume
Increase circulating load
Reduce screening efficiency
Cause uneven crushing
Increase maintenance requirements
If the raw material contains a significant amount of clay or sticky fines, a suitable scalping or washing process may be required.
Removing unwanted fines before crushing can prevent the crusher from spending energy crushing material that does not need further size reduction.
Crusher operating conditions affect wear distribution.
Running a crusher continuously below its appropriate operating range may result in poor crushing conditions and uneven wear.
For cone crushers in particular, maintaining a suitable feed level and consistent material flow helps the crushing chamber work as intended.
The goal is not simply to keep the crusher running.
The goal is to keep it running under stable and appropriate operating conditions.
Regular inspection can prevent small wear problems from becoming expensive failures.
Operators should monitor:
Liner thickness
Jaw plate profile
Mantle and concave wear
Blow bar condition
Wear distribution
Cracks
Loose components
Unusual vibration
Changes in product size
Replacing a wear part at the appropriate point is generally better than waiting until it fails completely.
However, replacing it too early also wastes useful material.
A practical maintenance strategy should therefore establish a replacement threshold based on actual operating experience and manufacturer recommendations.
Some wear components can be rotated, reversed, or repositioned depending on the crusher design.
For example, certain jaw plates can be turned around to make better use of the remaining wear material.
This can help achieve more uniform wear and extend the useful life of the component.
However, not every wear part can be rotated or reused.
Operators should follow the crusher manufacturer's maintenance instructions and inspect the part before deciding whether repositioning is appropriate.
Incorrectly installed or poorly fitted wear parts can create uneven loading.
Before operation, check:
Correct liner type
Correct installation
Proper fastening
Contact surfaces
Bolts and locking systems
Clearance
Crusher alignment
A small installation problem can become a major maintenance issue after thousands of tons of material have passed through the crusher.
Proper installation is therefore part of wear-cost management.
Wear parts do not operate independently of the crusher.
Poor maintenance of bearings, lubrication systems, hydraulic systems, or other components can indirectly increase wear.
Regular maintenance should include:
Lubrication checks
Hydraulic system inspection
Bearing inspection
Drive system inspection
Fastener checks
Temperature monitoring
Vibration monitoring
Crusher chamber inspection
A crusher operating outside normal mechanical conditions may consume wear parts faster than expected.
Modern crushing plants can use operating data to identify abnormal conditions.
Useful data may include:
Tons per hour
Motor power
Crusher pressure
CSS
Feed rate
Product size
Operating hours
Wear-part life
For example, if power consumption suddenly increases while production remains unchanged, this may indicate a feed or crushing-condition problem.
Tracking these parameters over time can help operators identify trends before they become major failures.
Closed-circuit crushing is common in aggregate and mining plants.
A typical process is:
Crusher → Vibrating Screen → Oversize Return → Crusher
Some circulating load is normal.
However, poor screening efficiency, incorrect crusher settings, or excessive oversize can increase the amount of material returning to the crusher.
Higher circulating load means more material passes through the crusher multiple times.
This can increase:
Wear
Energy consumption
Crusher loading
Conveyor loading
Improving screen efficiency and crusher settings can therefore reduce unnecessary wear.
A crusher that is too small for the required production may operate continuously under excessive load.
This can increase wear and maintenance costs.
On the other hand, installing a crusher that is much larger than necessary can increase capital and operating costs without providing meaningful benefits.
The correct selection should consider:
Required TPH
Feed size
Material characteristics
Reduction ratio
Final product size
Operating hours
Expected future production
A properly sized crushing plant generally provides more stable operating conditions.
Wear costs should not be evaluated only at the crusher.
For example:
Feeding → Primary Crushing → Secondary Crushing → Screening → Tertiary Crushing → Final Products
A problem in one stage can increase the workload of another.
If the primary crusher produces excessive oversize, the secondary crusher may experience increased loading.
If the screen performs poorly, the crusher may process more material than necessary.
If the final product requirements are too strict, the circulating load may increase.
Whole-plant optimization is therefore often more effective than optimizing one crusher in isolation.
Unexpected wear-part failures can result in expensive downtime.
For critical crushing equipment, it is useful to maintain an appropriate inventory of:
Jaw plates
Mantles
Concaves
Blow bars
Screen media
Bolts and fastening components
Other critical replacement parts
The correct inventory level depends on lead time, production schedule, wear rate, and supplier availability.
The objective is not to hold excessive inventory, but to avoid a situation where a relatively inexpensive wear part stops a high-value production line for several days.
When purchasing wear parts, price should not be the only selection criterion.
Compare suppliers based on:
Wear life
Material quality
Manufacturing consistency
Fit and installation
Delivery time
Technical support
Warranty
Cost per ton
A lower-cost liner that lasts 30% less time may be more expensive in the long run.
The best supplier evaluation should therefore use actual production data whenever possible.
A simple improvement process can be organized into five steps:
Record the purchase price, service life, tons produced, and replacement frequency of each major wear component.
Compare different wear-part types using actual production data.
Check feed size, abrasiveness, CSS, chamber selection, feed distribution, and operating conditions.
Optimize feeding, screening, crusher settings, and maintenance.
After changing the operating conditions or wear parts, measure the actual service life and cost per ton.
This creates a continuous improvement cycle rather than relying on assumptions.
Suppose a cone crusher produces 400 TPH and operates for 10 hours per day.
Daily production is:
400 × 10 = 4,000 tons/day
If one liner set lasts 30 days:
4,000 × 30 = 120,000 tons
If the liner set costs $18,000:
$18,000 ÷ 120,000 = $0.15/ton
Now suppose better feed distribution and optimized operating parameters increase liner life to 36 days.
Production becomes:
4,000 × 36 = 144,000 tons
The new wear cost is:
$18,000 ÷ 144,000 = $0.125/ton
The difference is:
$0.15 − $0.125 = $0.025/ton
At 120,000 tons, this represents approximately:
$3,000 of wear-part cost reduction
This example shows why relatively small improvements in liner life can have a meaningful effect on large-volume crushing operations.
In practice, the major factors can be summarized as follows:
| Factor | Potential Impact on Wear |
|---|---|
| Material abrasiveness | High |
| Incorrect feed size | High |
| Uneven feeding | High |
| Incorrect CSS | High |
| Poor chamber selection | High |
| Excessive circulating load | High |
| Poor maintenance | Medium to High |
| Incorrect wear material | High |
| Poor installation | Medium to High |
| Inefficient screening | Medium |
| Unstable operating conditions | High |
The actual impact varies from one application to another.
Reducing crusher wear-part costs is not simply about buying cheaper liners or jaw plates.
The biggest savings often come from improving the way the entire crushing system operates.
A practical strategy is to:
Select the right wear parts → Control feed conditions → Optimize crusher settings → Maintain stable feeding → Improve screening → Inspect regularly → Track cost per ton
For hard and abrasive materials, even a small improvement in wear life can generate significant savings when the plant produces hundreds of thousands or millions of tons per year.
The key metric should always be total wear cost per ton, supported by real production and maintenance data.
Maintain stable feeding, avoid oversized material, use the correct chamber and liner profile, optimize the crusher setting, monitor wear regularly, and keep the crusher properly maintained.
Common causes include abrasive material, uneven feeding, oversized feed, unsuitable jaw plate profiles, incorrect operating conditions, and poor feed distribution.
There is no universal replacement interval. Replacement should be based on actual wear measurements, production volume, crusher performance, and the manufacturer's recommended limits.
No. The most important factor is the total cost per ton. A more expensive wear part may be more economical if it provides significantly longer service life.
Divide the total cost of the wear part by the tons produced during its service life:
Wear Cost per Ton = Wear Part Cost ÷ Production During Service Life
Yes. Incorrect settings can increase crushing forces, reduce efficiency, increase circulating load, or create unfavorable wear patterns. Settings should be optimized for the material and required product size.
How to Choose the Right Crusher for Hard Rock 27/9/2026
Hard rock crushing is one of the most demanding applications in the mining and aggregate industry. Materials such as granite, basalt, quartzite, and other highly abrasive rocks require crushers that can handle high compressive strength, large feed sizes, and continuous heavy-duty operation.
Choosing the right crusher is not simply a matter of selecting the machine with the highest rated capacity. The complete crushing process must be considered, including feed size, material hardness, reduction ratio, required output size, production capacity, and the number of crushing stages.
This guide explains how to select crushing equipment for hard rock applications and how to build a reliable crushing circuit.
Hard rock generally refers to rock with high compressive strength and significant resistance to crushing.
Common hard-rock materials include:
Granite
Basalt
Quartzite
Gabbro
Andesite
Some hard limestone
Iron ore
Copper ore
Other metallic ores
Hard and abrasive materials can accelerate wear on crusher liners, jaw plates, blow bars, and other wear components.
For this reason, crusher selection for hard rock needs to consider both crushing performance and wear resistance.
There is no single crusher that is suitable for every hard-rock application.
A typical hard-rock crushing plant may use:
Vibrating Feeder → Jaw Crusher → Cone Crusher → Vibrating Screen → Finished Products
The jaw crusher is commonly used for primary crushing because it can accept large feed sizes and reduce large rocks into a size suitable for secondary crushing.
A cone crusher is often used for secondary or tertiary crushing because it can efficiently process hard and abrasive material while producing a relatively cubic product.
The final configuration depends on the required capacity and product specifications.
Jaw crushers are commonly used as primary crushers in hard-rock applications.
Their main advantages include:
Large feed opening
High crushing force
Simple structure
Good reliability
Ability to handle large rocks
Suitability for primary crushing
For example, if the blasted rock has a maximum feed size of 600–800 mm, a jaw crusher may be selected as the first crushing stage.
However, the crusher should not be selected based only on the maximum feed size.
The actual feed gradation, required capacity, material hardness, and discharge setting must also be considered.
After primary crushing, the material may be reduced further by a cone crusher.
Cone crushers are widely used for hard-rock applications because the crushing process is based on compression rather than impact.
A typical circuit may look like:
Jaw Crusher → Cone Crusher → Vibrating Screen
Material larger than the required product size is returned to the cone crusher for further crushing.
This creates a closed circuit:
Cone Crusher → Screen → Oversize Return → Cone Crusher
The circulating load must be considered when calculating the actual capacity of the crushing circuit.
Reduction ratio describes the relationship between the feed size and the product size.
For example, if the maximum feed size is 500 mm and the required product size is approximately 50 mm, the overall reduction ratio is around:
500 ÷ 50 = 10
A single crusher may not be the most efficient way to achieve such a large reduction.
Instead, the plant may use several crushing stages.
For example:
500 mm → 120 mm → 30–50 mm
This distributes the crushing work between the primary and secondary stages.
For hard rock, using the correct number of crushing stages can improve product quality, reduce excessive wear, and stabilize plant operation.
Two-stage crushing may be sufficient when the required product size is relatively coarse.
For example:
Jaw Crusher → Cone Crusher → Screen
can be suitable for producing several relatively coarse aggregate products.
However, if the project requires a large amount of fine material or manufactured sand, a third crushing stage may be necessary.
A typical three-stage circuit could be:
Jaw Crusher → Secondary Cone Crusher → Tertiary Cone Crusher → Screen
Alternatively, a vertical shaft impact crusher may be added when a specific particle shape or manufactured sand is required.
The correct choice depends on the final product specifications.
One of the most common mistakes in crusher selection is focusing only on the required output capacity.
The maximum feed size can significantly affect the choice of primary crusher.
Consider two projects that both require 500 TPH.
Project A:
Maximum feed size: 300 mm
Hard granite
Final product: 0–25 mm
Project B:
Maximum feed size: 800 mm
Hard granite
Final product: 0–25 mm
Although both projects have the same target capacity, the primary crushing requirements can be very different.
The second project may require a larger primary crusher or additional feed preparation.
Therefore, a proper equipment selection process should always begin with the raw material characteristics and feed gradation, not just the target TPH.
Hard rock is often highly abrasive.
The most important wear components may include:
Jaw plates
Cone crusher liners
Mantle and concave
Feed plates
Impact components
Screen media
High wear rates can increase the operating cost of a crushing plant.
For this reason, buyers should consider:
Cost per ton of production
rather than simply:
Purchase price of the crusher
A crusher with a lower initial price may not necessarily have a lower total operating cost if its wear parts require frequent replacement.
Although hard rock itself may be dry, the material can contain surface moisture or clay.
High moisture and sticky fines can create problems in:
Feeders
Crushing chambers
Vibrating screens
Transfer points
Conveyors
If the material contains significant clay or sticky fines, a suitable screening and scalping arrangement may be required before the primary crusher.
Removing problematic fines before crushing can reduce unnecessary crushing work and improve plant stability.
A crushing plant should be designed as a complete system.
For example:
Feeder Capacity ≥ Jaw Crusher Capacity
Jaw Crusher Capacity ≥ Secondary Crusher Throughput
Secondary Crusher + Screen Capacity ≥ Required Finished Product Output
The exact values depend on the material, operating conditions, circuit design, and equipment specifications.
If one machine is significantly undersized, it can become the bottleneck of the entire plant.
For example, installing a high-capacity cone crusher after an undersized jaw crusher does not automatically increase total plant production.
The complete material flow must be balanced.
Consider a granite quarry with:
Capacity: 500 TPH
Maximum feed size: approximately 600 mm
Material: hard granite
Final products: 0–5 mm, 5–10 mm, 10–20 mm, and 20–31.5 mm
A possible process is:
Raw Granite → Vibrating Feeder → Jaw Crusher → Cone Crusher → Vibrating Screen → Finished Products
Oversize material from the screen returns to the cone crusher.
Depending on the required percentage of fine material and product shape, the plant may use an additional tertiary crushing stage or sand-making equipment.
The final equipment selection should be based on actual laboratory or site material testing and the required product distribution.
Capacity is important, but it is not enough.
Feed size, hardness, abrasiveness, moisture, and final product requirements must also be evaluated.
Hard rock can significantly increase liner consumption.
Wear-part life should be included in the operating-cost calculation.
Trying to achieve a very large reduction ratio in a single stage can increase energy consumption and wear.
Oversizing equipment can increase investment and operating costs without providing meaningful benefits if the actual feed rate is much lower than the machine's capacity.
The screen is part of the crushing circuit.
Poor screening efficiency can increase circulating load and reduce the actual production of finished products.
If production is expected to increase significantly in the future, the plant layout should allow reasonable expansion.
A practical selection process can follow these steps:
Step 1: Identify the Material
Determine whether the material is granite, basalt, quartzite, iron ore, or another hard rock.
Step 2: Determine Maximum Feed Size
Measure the largest rock size and understand the complete feed gradation.
Step 3: Determine Required Capacity
Define the required production rate in TPH based on actual operating hours.
Step 4: Define Final Products
Specify the required product sizes and the percentage of each product.
Step 5: Determine the Reduction Ratio
Calculate how much the material needs to be reduced between the feed and final product.
Step 6: Select Crushing Stages
Determine whether two-stage, three-stage, or additional crushing is required.
Step 7: Check Wear and Operating Costs
Evaluate expected liner life, energy consumption, maintenance requirements, and cost per ton.
Step 8: Balance the Complete Plant
Match the feeder, crushers, screens, conveyors, and stockpiling system.
Hard-rock crushing requires more than simply choosing a powerful crusher.
The best solution is a balanced crushing system designed around the actual material and production requirements.
Jaw crushers are commonly used for primary reduction, while cone crushers are widely used for secondary and tertiary crushing of hard and abrasive materials. Vibrating screens then separate the material into the required product sizes, with oversize material returned to the crushing circuit when necessary.
The most important factors to evaluate are material hardness, abrasiveness, feed size, required capacity, reduction ratio, final product specifications, crushing stages, and operating cost.
A properly designed hard-rock crushing plant can provide stable production, controlled wear, consistent product quality, and better long-term operating efficiency.
Jaw crushers are commonly used for primary granite crushing, while cone crushers are frequently used for secondary and tertiary stages. The final selection depends on feed size, capacity, product requirements, and granite characteristics.
Yes. Cone crushers are widely used for hard and abrasive materials such as basalt. The correct chamber, liner configuration, feed size, and operating parameters should be selected according to the application.
Yes. Jaw crushers are commonly used for primary crushing of hard rock because they can accept large feed sizes and provide high crushing force.
It depends on the feed size, final product size, reduction ratio, required capacity, and product shape. Many hard-rock plants use two or three crushing stages.
Correct crusher selection, stable feeding, proper closed-side settings, suitable wear materials, regular maintenance, and avoiding excessive fines or oversized feed can help control wear costs.
What is the typical 500 TPH crushing process? 24/9/2026
A typical 500 TPH crushing process is designed to produce approximately 500 tonnes of processed material per hour under the specified operating conditions. The exact process depends on the raw material, maximum feed size, required final products, and whether the plant needs two-stage or three-stage crushing.
For a hard-rock aggregate application, a common 500 TPH crushing process is:
Raw Material → Vibrating Feeder → Jaw Crusher → Cone Crusher → Vibrating Screen → Finished Products
In a closed-circuit configuration, oversize material from the vibrating screen is returned to the cone crusher for further crushing.
1. Feeding
Large rocks are loaded into a feed hopper and delivered to the primary crusher by a vibrating feeder.
The feeder provides a controlled and relatively stable flow of material, helping prevent overloading of the primary crusher.
2. Primary Crushing
A jaw crusher is commonly used for primary crushing when the feed material is large and hard.
Its main purpose is to reduce large rocks into a smaller size suitable for secondary crushing.
For example:
Maximum feed size → Primary jaw crusher → Intermediate crushed material
The actual crusher model and discharge size depend on the feed characteristics and required plant capacity.
3. Secondary Crushing
After primary crushing, the material is transported to the secondary crusher.
For hard and abrasive rock such as granite, basalt, or some types of ore, a cone crusher is commonly considered for secondary crushing.
The cone crusher further reduces the material and prepares it for screening.
4. Screening
The crushed material then enters a vibrating screen.
The screen separates the material into different size fractions according to the required product specifications.
For example, a 500 TPH aggregate plant may produce several products such as:
0–5 mm
5–10 mm
10–20 mm
20–31.5 mm
The actual product sizes depend on the customer's requirements.
5. Closed-Circuit Return
Material that is larger than the required screen opening is returned to the crusher through a return conveyor.
The basic closed-circuit flow is:
Jaw Crusher → Cone Crusher → Vibrating Screen
** ↘ Oversize → Return to Cone Crusher**
This allows correctly sized material to leave the circuit while oversize material continues to be processed.
No.
A 500 TPH plant can use either a two-stage or three-stage crushing circuit depending on the material and final product requirements.
A relatively simple configuration may be:
Jaw Crusher → Cone Crusher → Screen
A more complex configuration may be:
Jaw Crusher → Cone Crusher → Tertiary Crusher/VSI → Screen
A three-stage configuration may be considered when the plant requires finer products, higher reduction ratios, improved particle shape, or manufactured sand.
A typical hard-rock 500 TPH plant may include:
| Equipment | Main Function |
|---|---|
| Vibrating Feeder | Controls material feeding |
| Jaw Crusher | Primary crushing |
| Cone Crusher | Secondary crushing |
| Tertiary Crusher or VSI | Additional reduction or shaping |
| Vibrating Screen | Product classification |
| Belt Conveyors | Material transportation |
| Dust Control System | Dust suppression or collection |
| Electrical Control System | Plant operation and monitoring |
The exact equipment configuration should be determined after evaluating the raw material and final product requirements.
A plant rated around 500 TPH does not necessarily produce exactly 500 tonnes every hour under all conditions.
Actual production can be affected by:
Rock hardness
Abrasiveness
Maximum feed size
Feed gradation
Moisture content
Crusher settings
Screen efficiency
Circulating load
Equipment availability
Operator control
This is why crushing plant design should focus on the performance of the complete process, rather than selecting individual machines based only on their nominal capacity.
For a hard-rock aggregate project, a typical process could be:
Raw Granite
↓
Vibrating Feeder
↓
Jaw Crusher
↓
Cone Crusher
↓
Vibrating Screen
↓
0–5 mm + 5–10 mm + 10–20 mm + 20–31.5 mm
with oversize material returning to the cone crusher.
If manufactured sand or improved particle shape is required, a VSI crusher can be added:
Jaw Crusher → Cone Crusher → VSI → Vibrating Screen
The final configuration should be determined according to the customer's feed material, production target, final product specifications, and site conditions.
Why
Choose Us
Passionate
Professional
Support
